<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fire Sale on NEW Voting Machines</title>
	<link>http://iowavoters.org/2006/02/15/fire-sale-on-new-voting-machines/</link>
	<description>for Open and Transparent Elections</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 03:54:20 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: NC Voter</title>
		<link>http://iowavoters.org/2006/02/15/fire-sale-on-new-voting-machines/#comment-22</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2006 19:47:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://iowavoters.org/2006/02/15/fire-sale-on-new-voting-machines/#comment-22</guid>
					<description>Diebold is getting desperate. I hope the Ohio folks can get some money back.

I am glad that Diebold didn't want to do business in North Carolina, even though our State Board of Elections certified them.

Here is the real reason Diebold left NC, see this section of the law:

SECTION 2.(a)  Part 2 of Article 14A of Chapter 163...

(3)       The chief executive officer of the vendor shall sign a sworn affidavit that the source code and other material in escrow is the same being used in its voting systems in this State. The chief executive officer shall ensure that the statement is true on a continuing basis.

(4)       The vendor shall promptly notify the State Board of Elections and the county board of elections of any county using its voting system of any decertification of the same system in any state, of any defect in the same system known to have occurred anywhere, and of any relevant defect known to have occurred in similar systems. 

(5)       The vendor shall maintain an office in North Carolina with staff to service the contract.

(b)       Penalties. – Willful violation of any of the duties in subsection (a) of this section is a Class G felony. Substitution of source code into an operating voting system without notification as provided by subdivision (a)(2) of this section is a Class I felony. In addition to any other applicable penalties, violations of this section are subject to a civil penalty to be assessed by the State Board of Elections in its discretion in an amount of up to one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000) per violation. A civil penalty assessed under this section shall be subject to the provisions of G.S. 163‑278.34(e).&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Diebold is getting desperate. I hope the Ohio folks can get some money back.</p>
<p>I am glad that Diebold didn&#8217;t want to do business in North Carolina, even though our State Board of Elections certified them.</p>
<p>Here is the real reason Diebold left NC, see this section of the law:</p>
<p>SECTION 2.(a)  Part 2 of Article 14A of Chapter 163&#8230;</p>
<p>(3)       The chief executive officer of the vendor shall sign a sworn affidavit that the source code and other material in escrow is the same being used in its voting systems in this State. The chief executive officer shall ensure that the statement is true on a continuing basis.</p>
<p>(4)       The vendor shall promptly notify the State Board of Elections and the county board of elections of any county using its voting system of any decertification of the same system in any state, of any defect in the same system known to have occurred anywhere, and of any relevant defect known to have occurred in similar systems. </p>
<p>(5)       The vendor shall maintain an office in North Carolina with staff to service the contract.</p>
<p>(b)       Penalties. – Willful violation of any of the duties in subsection (a) of this section is a Class G felony. Substitution of source code into an operating voting system without notification as provided by subdivision (a)(2) of this section is a Class I felony. In addition to any other applicable penalties, violations of this section are subject to a civil penalty to be assessed by the State Board of Elections in its discretion in an amount of up to one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000) per violation. A civil penalty assessed under this section shall be subject to the provisions of G.S. 163‑278.34(e).&#8221;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
